January 01, 2005Royale With Cheese
I started thinking about this when I was in Brussels 'Gare du Midi' - one of our major train stations and the terminus for the Eurostar and Thalys high-speed trains. I was walking around, wasting time waiting for a train home, when I came upon a vending machine. It took me a minute to figure out why it seemed so weird to me, but then I noticed ... between the orange juice and the Coca-Cola, was an entire row of beer cans. Now I've always known that vending machines in Belgium will provide the thirsty with beer and the hungry with waffles (I kid you not) but then taht starts me thinking... Why is it that anglo-saxon countries seem to have these draconian measures preventing their populations from drinking - it's as if, without these regulations, Britain and certain American states would immediately disintegrate into drunken revolution and public group vomiting sessions. And if you've lived there, and seen what happens between 10:45 and 11pm, you know I'm not kidding. Vincent: … but you know what the funniest thing about Europe is? Right now, in the UK, there is an ongoing debate about the liberalisation of the laws that control the consumption of alcohol. Specifically, they're talking about removing the 11-o'Clock limit on licensed premises. At the moment, if you're drinking in a pub, at 10:45, a bell will be rung, or the pub manager will thump the bar and yell, 'last orders'. That means that you have 15 minutes to order from the bar before they shut it down for the night. They have no choice, it's the law. So up shuffles a representative from every group in the bar, and the alcohol flows, for the next 15 minutes, even faster than it has for the last 3 hours. Once the bar is closed, these same laws insist that the licensed premises be empty by 11:15. That means that these pints of beer have to be drunk in about 15 minutes. So everyone drinks them as fast as they can, go into the street, and gradually degenerate as the alcohol seeps into their systems. The fear that comes with the liberalisation idea is that the British have had to time their drinking to finish at 11pm ever since the last world war, and that this is so deeply ingrained that if you were to relax the rule, they'd still start drinking at the same time, they'd get just as drunk just as fast, but there would no longer be a way to get them to stop come 11pm. Instead, they'd just keep drinking, reaching levels of inebriation that have previously been unattainable on a normal day. Hence the resistance to the whole concept of relaxing the licensing laws. What's more, the clubs and very rare bars in England that do actually have the right to stay open until 2am are in the enviable position of having far too little room to cater for the huge crowds of people who would like to continue drinking on a Friday or Saturday night. This results in very long lines outside these select establishments, with extremely unpleasant and arrogant bouncers whom you have to be very polite to (or just have a folded 20 pound note in your hand) in order to get them to let you in. These bars can charge lots of money to let you have the privilege of continued alcohol past 11pm, because there are no alternatives. If everything gets liberalised, they're going to see their business tail off a little, and they'll lose the ability to charge at the door, because, hey... alternatives with pleasant staff, minus the 500-pound gorilla in the monkey-suit to suck up to at the front door. So what will happen when the laws finally do get relaxed (because I'm pretty sure they eventually will be)? Will the British people find the ability to control their drinking, or will London become like so many overrun foreign tourist resorts, with teenagers throwing up against the side of buildings and bouncers breaking up additional alcohol-and-testosterone-fuelled confrontations? Will there be an adaptation period and then an adaptation in drinking habits? As social experiments go, this could be interesting to watch. From a distance. Posted by nlvp at January 1, 2005 02:31 PMComments
The restriction on alcohol in America seems to have more to do with that country's puritanical streak than with fears of drunkenness. As for the UK, I'm not sure people get drunk because they have to finish their drinking by 11. Rather, people go out with the intention of getting drunk as quickly as possible and then staying in that condition until closing time. I suspect that with relaxed licensing laws, over time (i.e., a generation) people would start to acquire more sensible drinking habits. In the short term... it'll be messy. Interestingly, one of the people resisiting the change to licensing laws is the Metropolitan Police Commissioner on the grounds that drunk people keep attacking his officers. Posted by: Incandenza at January 1, 2005 02:58 PMPost a comment
|